February 13, 1998© HyperLaw, Inc.®

HyperLaw v. West Publishing Company Links and Information


Where to buy clomid and hcg

Can you get clomid in uk

HyperLaw Claim that West Cannot Copryight to the text of Court Opinions

Buy over the counter clomid for stories about the HyperLaw victory.

  • West Files Appellate Brief on September 29, 1997 in Second Circuit in HyperLaw v. West on the Copyrightability of the Text of Court Opinions HyperLaw v. West.Buy clomid in germany As expected, the brief takes enormous liberties with the facts. The HyperLaw response is due in 30 days. A motion for filing an amicus brief in opposition to the West brief must be filed with the amicus brief within the 30 day period. Where to buy provera and clomid .
  • September 29, 1997. Clomid 50 mg prescription Reed Elsevier had filed a motion to submit an amicus brief in HyperLaw v. West in support of West's claims to the copyright of text of court opinions. The amicus brief notes that Reed Elsevier's stock had fallen as a result of the district court's May ruling in support of HyperLaw's position. Reed Elsevier also quotes from the database protection report of the Copyright Office. Reed Elsevier's latest position, supporting the copyrightability of the text of court opinions is just one more illustration of the phenomena of "Wexis", the anticompetitive consortium between West and Lexis which resulted from the 1988 secret agreements between West and Mead (former owner of Lexis). In addition, this latest action demonstrates the naivete of the Antitrust Division and State Attorney Generals who relied upon Lexis to express the public's interests during the negotiations to approve the acquisition of West by Thompson. The motion and brief are contained in a 990 KB PDF file.
  • Posted January 30, 1998. Brief For Amicus Curiae American Association Of Legal Publishers -- Second Circuit Text Appeal, Nov. 1997

  • Posted February 13, 1998. Buying generic clomid online

  • Opinion of Judge John S. Martin, Matthew Bender and HyperLaw v. West 94-CV-589, May 19, 1996. This is a link to the New York Law Journal's Web Site. West may not copyright the text of judicial opinions as they appear in West reporters, ruled Judge John S. Martin. on May 19, 1997, supporting HyperLaw's position after a January, 1997 trial.

  • INTERVENOR-PLAINTIFF HYPERLAW, INC.'S POST-TRIAL BRIEF-IN-CHIEF - CHALLENGE TO WEST TEXT COPYRIGHT CLAIMS - March 4, 1997

  • TRANSCRIPT, JANUARY 27-28 1997 TRIAL HYPERLAW V. WEST PUBLSHING COMPANY Long file: 388 k.

  • A Tilting of the Tables The Connecticut Law Tribune 2/3/97, Tom Scheffey
    "A federal judge tells West -- a company famous for getting the law right -- that its pet theory for owning the contents of its books is a legal loser."

    Report on HyperLaw -- West text copyright trial held January 27 - 28, 1996, United States District Court, Sourther District of New York.

    Star-Pagination

  • HyperLaw Comments Re West Loss on Citation Copyright

  • Complete Transcript Of November 26, 1996 Hearing

  • Excerpts From Transcript Of November 26, 1996 Hearing

  • West Loses Long Copyright Fight Over Pagination The Recorder, 11/25/96, by Krysten Crawford.

  • Hyperlaw's Complaint -- March, 1994

  • HyperLaw Summary Judgment Reply Brief in Matthew Bender/HyperLaw v. West 94 Civ. 0589, U.S.D.C. S.D.N.Y., November 4, 1996.

    Link Fixed March 28, 1997

  • Alan D. Sugarman Summary Judgment Affidavit in Matthew Bender/HyperLaw v. West 94 Civ. 0589, U.S.D.C. S.D.N.Y., November 4, 1996.

  • HyperLaw Motion for Summary Judgment -- Matthew Bender & HyperLaw v. West -- September 24, 1996 -- West May Not Claim Copyright to Text of Opinions

    New March 28, 1997

  • Alan D. Sugarman Affidavit in Support ofHyperLaw Motion for Summary Judgment -- Matthew Bender & HyperLaw v. West -- September 24, 1996 -- Detailing West Statements re First Page Citation
    In Word Perfect Format.

  • The Department of Justice Amicus Brief October 3, 1996

    NEW MONDAY DECEMBER 16, 1996:

  • Matthew Bender Brief In Support Of Motion For Summary Judgment - August 5, 1996

    NEW MONDAY DECEMBER 16, 1996:

  • Matthew Bender's Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Opposition To West's Motion For Summary Judgment -- August 19, 1996

  • Judge Martin's Opinions Denying West Motion To Dismiss Hyperlaw - August 5, 1996

  • Justiciability Opinion: Matthew Bender & HyperLaw v. West, 94 Civ. 0589, U.S.D.C., S.D.N.Y., May 1, 1996